Fantasy Hub Player Intelligence

Quinn Hughes

MIN · D · Age 26

GP 4 · G-A-PTS 2-4-6

Limited sample STRONG OVERPERFORMANCE VERY LOW confidence

Expected P/G 1,15 Limited sample · Rank appears after 20 GP

Current trajectory Early season 4 GP · 3Y baseline 1,09

Actual P/G 1,50 Limited sample

Deployment 99 #1 among D on team

Driver 97 #2 among D on team

4 GP current season Process: 20% current Role: 40% current

Team context

Minnesota Wild Balanced environment

Fantasy environment #18 of 32 NHL teams

Team xP/G #18 0,72 top-8 xP/G

Offensive environment Above Average EV OZ #11 · shot diff #14

Power-play environment Strong PP OZ #2

Pace & activity Poor #29 NHL · 11,5 bursts/g · 55,4 km/g · 40,4 attempts/g

Balanced environment · above average offensive process · strong power-play environment.

View MIN team context →

Usage & Deployment

Overall usageSeason rate

TOI/G27:50

PP TOI/G4:13

SOG/G3,50

5v5 roleObserved role

D1Defense pair

Jared Spurgeon · Quinn Hughes

Pair time · last game

19:37

TOI · With this pair · last game

71%

TOI · With this pair · last 3

75%

TOI · With this pair · season

73%

Trend

+2 percentage points ↑+2 pts ↑

Power playObserved PP role

PP1Power-play unit

Joel Eriksson Ek · Kirill Kaprizov · Quinn Hughes · Matt Boldy · Maxim Shabanov

PP share · last game

87%

PP share · last 3

78%

PP share · season

80%

First-unit starts · last 3

7 / 8

Trend

-2 percentage points ↓-2 pts ↓

SituationalLast 5

Vs empty net

4% · 0:07

Own goalie pulled

100% · 0:58

Derived from official NHL shift charts + play-by-play · Established · High confidence · 12 recent PP opportunities

Production

2026–27 season

PTS

P/G

1,50

SOG/G

3,50

TOI/G

27:50

PP TOI/G

4:13

Official NHL video

Recent highlights

Goals & assists · last 5 games

MIN @ TBL OKT 8

▶ Assist on B. Coleman goal P2 · 14:01 ▶ Goal EV · Wrist P2 · 02:32

MIN @ BUF OKT 6

▶ Assist on M. Shabanov goal P2 · 15:38

BOS @ MIN OKT 3

▶ Assist on J. Spurgeon goal P3 · 03:24 ▶ Goal PP · Wrist P2 · 12:28

MIN @ NSH OKT 1

▶ Assist on K. Kaprizov goal P3 · 04:42

Performance

Process vs Deployment

0–100 · F/D percentile · sample-adjusted

Limited sample

The process-versus-Deployment profile is still sample-sensitive.

Process 97

Deployment 99

Offensive Driver Elite · limited sample

Shot Creation High-end · limited sample

Play Creation Elite · limited sample

Deployment Elite · limited sample

Median High-end Elite

Trajectory

Early season

3Y baseline 1,09 Historical P/G

2026–27 1,50 vs baseline +0,41

Expected P/G 1,15 vs baseline +0,06

Current-season production is still below the 20-game threshold; the historical baseline is shown without a strong trajectory call.

Intelligence

Model signals

MODEL

Elite Deployment strongly supports current fantasy value.

Deployment 99 is in the top range of the position group.

MODEL

Elite underlying offensive process supports the profile.

Offensive Driver 97 is in the top range of the position group.

MODEL

Production is running above expectation.

Actual P/G exceeds Expected P/G by 0,35.

MODEL

Sample size limits confidence in the current profile.

The model currently reports VERY LOW confidence.

Current value

The current fantasy profile has both high-end process and high-end Deployment behind it. Expected P/G currently sits at 1,15.