Fantasy Hub Player Intelligence

Filip Hronek

VAN · D · Age 28

GP 5 · G-A-PTS 0-5-5

Limited sample STRONG OVERPERFORMANCE VERY LOW confidence

Expected P/G 0,62 Limited sample · Rank appears after 20 GP

Current trajectory Early season 5 GP · 3Y baseline 0,58

Actual P/G 1,00 Limited sample

Deployment 92 #2 among D on team

Driver 56 #2 among D on team

5 GP current season Process: 25% current Role: 50% current

Team context

Vancouver Canucks Limited fantasy environment

Fantasy environment #31 of 32 NHL teams

Team xP/G #31 0,54 top-8 xP/G

Offensive environment Poor EV OZ #29 · shot diff #29

Power-play environment Poor PP OZ #28

Pace & activity Average #18 NHL · 17,4 bursts/g · 57,5 km/g · 39,5 attempts/g

Limited fantasy environment · poor offensive process · poor power-play environment.

View VAN team context →

Usage & Deployment

Overall usageSeason rate

TOI/G25:14

PP TOI/G2:45

SOG/G1,20

5v5 roleObserved role

D1Defense pair

Filip Hronek · Zeev Buium

Pair time · last game

11:39

TOI · With this pair · last game

68%

TOI · With this pair · last 3

53%

TOI · With this pair · season

62%

Trend

-9 percentage points ↓-9 pts ↓

Power playObserved PP role

PP1Power-play unit

Brock Boeser · Jake DeBrusk · Filip Hronek · Elias Pettersson · Marco Rossi

PP share · last game

59%

PP share · last 3

58%

PP share · season

59%

First-unit starts · last 3

12 / 14

Trend

-1 percentage points ↓-1 pts ↓

SituationalLast 5

Vs empty net

100% · 0:36

Own goalie pulled

87% · 2:23

Derived from official NHL shift charts + play-by-play · Established · High confidence · 19 recent PP opportunities

Production

2026–27 season

PTS

P/G

1,00

SOG/G

1,20

TOI/G

25:14

PP TOI/G

2:45

Official NHL video

Recent highlights

Goals & assists · last 5 games

VGK @ VAN OKT 4

▶ Assist on P. Cotter goal P1 · 18:52

EDM @ VAN OKT 1

▶ Assist on J. Oleksiak goal P3 · 18:31 ▶ Assist on A. Bains goal P2 · 19:59

VAN @ EDM SEP 29

▶ Assist on E. Pettersson goal P3 · 05:15 ▶ Assist on M. Rossi goal P2 · 02:07

Performance

Process vs Deployment

0–100 · F/D percentile · sample-adjusted

Limited sample

The process-versus-Deployment profile is still sample-sensitive.

Process 56

Deployment 92

Offensive Driver Average · limited sample

Shot Creation Below average · limited sample

Play Creation Above average · limited sample

Deployment High-end · limited sample

Median High-end Elite

Trajectory

Early season

3Y baseline 0,58 Historical P/G

2026–27 1,00 vs baseline +0,42

Expected P/G 0,62 vs baseline +0,04

Current-season production is still below the 20-game threshold; the historical baseline is shown without a strong trajectory call.

Intelligence

Model signals

MODEL

Elite Deployment strongly supports current fantasy value.

Deployment 92 is in the top range of the position group.

MODEL

Production is running above expectation.

Actual P/G exceeds Expected P/G by 0,38.

MODEL

Sample size limits confidence in the current profile.

The model currently reports VERY LOW confidence.

Current value

The current fantasy profile is mixed. Expected P/G currently sits at 0,62.

VAN: power-play role update

Power-play deployment can materially change scoring opportunity. Confirm whether this represents a sustained unit change before treating it as permanent.

Game Day Tweets / @patersonjeff ↗

View all events →

NHL Edge Intelligence

Offensive creation average · territory low · team environment low

Offensive creationAverageShot 25 · Play 79

TerritoryLowEV OZ 37,1% · PP OZ 57,2%

Skating activityLow13,2 km/60 · max 31,7 km/h

Team environmentLowEV OZ #29 · shot diff #29

High-area SOG share0,0% Low-slot SOG /600,0 20–22 mph bursts /600,0 SampleDeveloping

Edge remains a context/shadow layer. It does not directly change Current Value or Expected P/G.

Model details

Performance model
performance_v2_1_4

Scale
transition_ref_v2

Driver vs Deployment
-36,1

Published
2026-10-09 06:29:21